The sensory organs can perceive both. And no special organs can be perceived "general existence and non-existence, similarity and dissimilarity, the same and different and one and more." Similarly also applies to honor and not honor, good and bad. "The mind is thinking about something through its own function, but the rest of the things are passed through the body." We perceive hard and soft by touch, but judging their existence and the antagonism between them is the mind. Only the mind can reach the existence; but if we can not achieve the existence, we can not achieve the truth. So we can not only through the senses and cognitive things, because alone through the senses we can not know whether things exist. So knowledge is thinking rather than the impression, and perception is not knowledge; because the perception "since it can not know the existence, so it is not true for the understanding of the truth

　　公司介紹:

　　金蘭企業策劃有限公司成立于2006年，是集城鄉規劃編制、建筑工程設計、市政工程設計、風景園林設計為一體的大型工程設計企業。公司技術力量雄厚，各專業技術人員齊全，服務周到及時，可提供從城鄉規劃編制到建筑設計、市政設計、風景園林設計等各類工程的設計、咨詢、服務等。公司項目涉及旅游、農業、酒店、餐飲、醫療、教育、居住、養老、辦公、商業、法院、工業廠房等多種類型建筑設計；以及城鄉規劃編制、生態農業項目規劃、旅游項目規劃、地產項目規劃、產業園區項目規劃等全方位的設計工作。近年來公司主營業務不斷增長，已成為國內最具影響力的設計品牌之一。

　　公司服務范圍:概念性規劃、總體規劃、詳細規劃、規劃設計文本

　　生態農業項目規劃設計、 旅游觀光項目規劃設計、城鄉建造規劃設計、 住宅小區規劃設計、物流園區規劃設計、養老項目規劃設計、景觀設計項目規劃、道路綠化規劃設計、河道整治規劃項目 、美麗鄉村規劃設計、酒店規劃設計、醫院規劃設計、學校規劃設計等規劃文本

　　公司:金蘭企劃

　　云南省十三五規劃摘要:The It is not easy to discern what is acceptable and which must be rejected in this argument that is equal to knowledge, and that Plato's discussion of three interrelated topics, namely, (1) knowledge is (2) man is the scale of all things; (3) all things are in a state of rheology. (1) the first topic (Plato's argument mainly involves only this topic) in addition to what we have just talked about the last It is argued that the law of comparison, the knowledge of existence, and the understanding of numbers, are the most essential things for knowledge, but that is, These can not be included in the perception, because they are not produced by any sensory organs. On these, we have to talk about the following things are different. Let us start with similar and not similar to start.

　　Suppose there are two colors, both of which I have seen, whether they are similar or not, but they are all me, in my case, should be accepted, and indeed not as a "perception" But as a "perception of judgment" to accept. I should say that perception is not knowledge, but merely an event that occurs; it belongs equally to both the physical world and the psychological world. We naturally, like Plato, want to perceive consciousness as a relationship between the perception and the object: we say "I see a table". But here the "I" and "table" is the logical structure. The core of the unprocessed thing here is just the color of some of the fragments. These colors are combined with tactile images, which can cause words and can be the source of memory. The sensation filled with the tactile image becomes one